linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:25:35 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	arm@...nel.org, kbuild-all@...org,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary CPUs

Hi Arnd,

2016-03-29 17:11 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 15:59:00 kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x557b4): Section mismatch in reference from the function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() to the function .init.text:uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways()
>>    The function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() references
>>    the function __init uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways().
>>    This is often because uniphier_cache_secondary_init lacks a __init
>>    annotation or the annotation of uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways is wrong.
>>
>
>
> I guess the former: uniphier_cache_secondary_init should be __init, as it will
> only be run at boot time.
>
> Please resend both patches.
>

I think the alternative solution suggested by Russell is much better.

I hope Russell will apply his one, and then I retract this series.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada