[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAS5AE9daz5F8OKAWgPHKGLB-px3-yi-hgSBfjjAUyxYnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:25:35 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm@...nel.org, kbuild-all@...org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary CPUs
Hi Arnd,
2016-03-29 17:11 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 15:59:00 kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x557b4): Section mismatch in reference from the function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() to the function .init.text:uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways()
>> The function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() references
>> the function __init uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways().
>> This is often because uniphier_cache_secondary_init lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways is wrong.
>>
>
>
> I guess the former: uniphier_cache_secondary_init should be __init, as it will
> only be run at boot time.
>
> Please resend both patches.
>
I think the alternative solution suggested by Russell is much better.
I hope Russell will apply his one, and then I retract this series.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists