[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iz2wxTbKvH4_YkE5wQswWATBGNo08RRmbY_SCA_n4tgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:50:24 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: call cpufreq hook in additional paths
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:59:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > - passing an argument into attach_entity_load_avg() to indicate
>> > whether calling the cpufreq hook is necessary
>> >
>> > Both of these are ugly in their own way but would avoid a runtime
>> > cost. Opinions welcome.
>>
>> Lemme see what this would look like while I throw the below into the bit
>> bucket.
>
> OK, so the below looks a lot more sane;
Yup.
> and has the surprising benefit of actually shrinking the text size..
>
> 43675 1226 24 44925 af7d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.base
> 43723 1226 24 44973 afad defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch
> 43595 1226 24 44845 af2d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch+
Interesting. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists