linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <cover.1459428540.git.jthumshirn@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:53:17 +0200
From:	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path

This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to 
scsi_target_state".

If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the target
removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the 3rd or 4th patch
targeting it.

Changes to v2:
* Reverse the order of patches as pointed out by James

Changes to v1:
* Fix error (hit BUG_ON()) discovered by the 0-Day bot.
* Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module removal"

Johannes Thumshirn (2):
  scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state
  Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module
    removal"

 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c   | 2 ++
 drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c  | 6 +++---
 include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.6