[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160331154234.GA3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:42:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <alfredoalvarezfernandez@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:59:54PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> So we should use macro like current_hardirq_context() here? Or
> considering the two helpers introduced in my RFC:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1455602265-16490-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com
>
> if you don't think that overkills ;-)
I changed it into the below; since I did significant edits, let me know
if you disagree and / or want your name taken off.
---
Subject: lockdep: Add task_irq_context()
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:57:40 +0800
task_irq_context(): returns the encoded irq_context of the task, the
return value is encoded in the same as ->irq_context of held_lock.
Always return 0 if !(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: sasha.levin@...cle.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455602265-16490-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2932,6 +2932,11 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_str
return 1;
}
+static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return 2 * !!task->hardirq_context + !!task->softirq_context;
+}
+
static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
struct held_lock *hlock)
{
@@ -2940,8 +2945,6 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct t
/*
* Keep track of points where we cross into an interrupt context:
*/
- hlock->irq_context = 2*(curr->hardirq_context ? 1 : 0) +
- curr->softirq_context;
if (depth) {
struct held_lock *prev_hlock;
@@ -2973,6 +2976,11 @@ static inline int mark_irqflags(struct t
return 1;
}
+static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
struct held_lock *hlock)
{
@@ -3241,6 +3249,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep
hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
hlock->instance = lock;
hlock->nest_lock = nest_lock;
+ hlock->irq_context = task_irq_context(curr);
hlock->trylock = trylock;
hlock->read = read;
hlock->check = check;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists