linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-binding: Add Qualcomm WCNSS control binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKbjUxOMbn00OOmwM1vvjRzC8RzX=4WA7WP+K2XYjOSMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:38:13 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-binding: Add Qualcomm WCNSS control binding

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu 31 Mar 07:28 PDT 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 09:35:24PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> [..]

[...]

>> > +
>> > +== WiFi
>> > +The following properties are defined to the WiFi node:
>> > +
>> > +- compatible:
>> > +   Usage: required
>> > +   Value type: <string>
>> > +   Definition: must be one of:
>> > +               "qcom,wcn3620-wlan",
>> > +               "qcom,wcn3660-wlan",
>> > +               "qcom,wcn3680-wlan"
>
> Digging through documentation and trying to answer the questions above
> made me realize that these numbers are for the external rf component,
> not the variants of the logic inside the SoC; and as such wrong.

Do you need to know both? Or only the firmware image needs to know?

>> > +
>> > +- qcom,wcnss-mmio:
>> > +   Usage: required
>> > +   Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>> > +   Definition: should specify base address and size of the WiFi related
>> > +               registers of WCNSS
>>
>> This is an address visible to the cpu?
>>
>
> Yes it is; the device is controlled both through SMD and mmio accessible
> registers, where the SMD interface is the primary interface.
>
> SMD being the primary "bus" I believe I can't use reg to denote this
> register range. Should I describe this in some other form?

That's a tricky one. I would create a node for the memory-mapped
portion with proper compatible and reg properties, and then make this
a phandle to that node. Something similar to how we do phandles to
syscon's.

Rob