linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: apq8064: add ahci ports-implemented mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56FD87C2.3020503@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:25:38 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jmaggard10@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: apq8064: add ahci ports-implemented mask

On 03/31/2016 08:31 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

> This patch adds new ports-implemented mask, which is required to get
> achi working on the mainline. Without this patch value read from
> PORTS_IMPL register which is zero would not enable any ports for
> software to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index 252b310..71d6fcb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@
>   		};
>
>   		sata0: sata@...00000 {
> -			compatible		= "generic-ahci";
> +			compatible		= "generic-ahci", "qcom,apq8064-ahci";

    The order of values should be reverse, no?

[...]

MBR, Sergei