lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160401070758.GA28352@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:07:58 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...ysocki.net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kbuild-all@...org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] smp: make wake up idle cpus more generic


* Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@...il.com> wrote:

> The wake_up_all_idle_cpus API always wake up all the online
> cpus, but sometimes we only want to wake up a set of cpus.
> 
> Use a generic function to wake up a group of cpus that is
> specified by the cpumask parameter. This generic API can
> benefit to the cases that only need to wake up a set of
> cpus.

What is the new user of this new argument to the wake-up call?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ