lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:01:30 +0300
From:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
To:	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] acpi: add support for loading SSDTs via configfs

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Lv,

>> Add support for acpi_user_table configfs items that allows the user to
>> load new tables. The data attributes contains the table data and once it
>> is filled from userspace the table is loaded and ACPI devices are
>> enumerated.
> [Lv Zheng]
> We've been considering to implement this facility before.
> The 2 alternative solutions are:
> 1. implement LOAD/UNLOAD ioctl for /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/acpidbg - this will be useful for extracting AML byte stream from kernel to be used by a userspace disassembler.

AFAIK adding new ioctls is discouraged.

> 2. transition /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/xxx into directory and implement /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/load, /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/unload - this should be able to meet your requirement.

We can't do that as it would break the ABI.

> So my first question is:
> Why do you use configfs rather than the existing mechanisms?

sysfs is not a good choice for dealing with objects created from
userspace, configfs was created to address this specific need. Since
we want to be able to create and load new tables from userspace this
use-case fits very well with configfs.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ