[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160401112919.GP3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:29:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: No need to check NULL later_mask
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:13:18PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> Unlike rt tasks, we (should) have no deadline tasks in
> booting phase before the mask is allocated, so we can
> safely remove the check.
Why? And have the kernel explode once it grows an early deadline task?
Is there _any_ benefit to this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists