lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri,  1 Apr 2016 15:23:06 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Optimize tick periodic cpu load updates

Don't bother with the whole pending tickless cpu load machinery if
we run a tick periodic kernel. That's less job for the CPU on ticks.

Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 394f008..1bb053e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4526,7 +4526,7 @@ decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx)
  * see decay_load_misses(). For NOHZ_FULL we get to subtract and add the extra
  * term. See the @active paramter.
  */
-static void __cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
+static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
 			      unsigned long pending_updates)
 {
 	unsigned long tickless_load = this_rq->cpu_load[0];
@@ -4567,24 +4567,6 @@ static void __cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
 	sched_avg_update(this_rq);
 }
 
-static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq,
-			    unsigned long curr_jiffies,
-			    unsigned long load)
-{
-	unsigned long pending_updates;
-
-	pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
-	if (pending_updates) {
-		this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
-		/*
-		 * In the regular NOHZ case, we were idle, this means load 0.
-		 * In the NOHZ_FULL case, we were non-idle, we should consider
-		 * its weighted load.
-		 */
-		__cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
-	}
-}
-
 /* Used instead of source_load when we know the type == 0 */
 static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 {
@@ -4592,6 +4574,18 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+static unsigned long cpu_load_pending(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
+	unsigned long pending_updates;
+
+	pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
+	if (pending_updates)
+		this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
+
+	return pending_updates;
+}
+
 /*
  * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the
  * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading
@@ -4617,7 +4611,7 @@ static void cpu_load_update_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
 	if (weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)))
 		return;
 
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), 0);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, 0, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4641,18 +4635,23 @@ void cpu_load_update_nohz_start(void)
  */
 void cpu_load_update_nohz_stop(void)
 {
-	unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
 	struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
 	unsigned long load;
 
-	if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
+	if (jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
 		return;
 
 	load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq));
+
 	raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, curr_jiffies, load);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 	raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
+static inline unsigned long cpu_load_pending(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 
 /*
@@ -4662,7 +4661,7 @@ void cpu_load_update_active(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
 	unsigned long load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq));
 
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), load);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1802013..d951701 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -585,8 +585,10 @@ struct rq {
 #endif
 	#define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
 	unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	unsigned long last_load_update_tick;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+# endif
 	u64 nohz_stamp;
 	unsigned long nohz_flags;
 #endif
-- 
2.7.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ