lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160401151017.GK3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:10:17 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/clock: Remove pointless test in
 cpu_clock/local_clock

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:46:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

> Remove the duplicate test by directly calling sched_clock_cpu() and let the
> static key act in this function instead. We can assume gcc is smart enough to
> inline cpu_clock()/local_clock() to sched_clock_cpu().

Why assume if you can easily check; so does it indeed inline?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ