Message-Id: <1459523553-29089-4-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Date:	Fri,  1 Apr 2016 17:12:29 +0200
From:	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Subject: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

This patch implements a more theoretically sound algorithm for
thracking the active utilisation: instead of decreasing it when a
task blocks, use a timer (the "inactive timer", named after the
"Inactive" task state of the GRUB algorithm) to decrease the
active utilisaation at the so called "0-lag time".

Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
---
 include/linux/sched.h   |   1 +
 kernel/sched/core.c     |   1 +
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |   1 +
 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index c617ea1..f285461 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ struct sched_dl_entity {
 	 * own bandwidth to be enforced, thus we need one timer per task.
 	 */
 	struct hrtimer dl_timer;
+	struct hrtimer inactive_timer;
 };
 
 union rcu_special {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index de38077..23d235c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2076,6 +2076,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->dl.rb_node);
 	init_dl_task_timer(&p->dl);
+	init_inactive_task_timer(&p->dl);
 	__dl_clear_params(p);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 05cfccb..97cd5f2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static void add_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
 	u64 se_bw = dl_se->dl_bw;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock);
 	dl_rq->running_bw += se_bw;
 }
 
@@ -54,11 +55,59 @@ static void sub_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
 	u64 se_bw = dl_se->dl_bw;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock);
 	dl_rq->running_bw -= se_bw;
 	if (WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < 0))
 		dl_rq->running_bw = 0;
 }
 
+static void task_go_inactive(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+	struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->inactive_timer;
+	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
+	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
+	ktime_t now, act;
+	s64 delta;
+	u64 zerolag_time;
+
+	WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_runtime == 0);
+
+	/* If the inactive timer is already armed, return immediately */
+	if (hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer))
+		return;
+
+
+	/*
+	 * We want the timer to fire at the "0 lag time", but considering
+	 * that it is actually coming from rq->clock and not from
+	 * hrtimer's time base reading.
+	 */
+	zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline -
+		 div64_long((dl_se->runtime * dl_se->dl_period),
+			dl_se->dl_runtime);
+
+	act = ns_to_ktime(zerolag_time);
+	now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
+	delta = ktime_to_ns(now) - rq_clock(rq);
+	act = ktime_add_ns(act, delta);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active
+	 * utilization now, instead of starting a timer
+	 */
+	if (ktime_us_delta(act, now) < 0) {
+		sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
+		if (!dl_task(p))
+			__dl_clear_params(p);
+
+		return;
+	}
+
+	get_task_struct(p);
+	hrtimer_start(timer, act, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+}
+
 static inline int is_leftmost(struct task_struct *p, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
 	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
@@ -526,7 +575,18 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
 
-	add_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
+	/*
+	 * If the "inactive timer" is still active, stop it and leave
+	 * the active utilisation unchanged.
+	 * Otherwise, increase the active utilisation.
+	 * If the timer cannot be cancelled, inactive_task_timer() will
+	 * find the task state as TASK_RUNNING, and will do nothing, so
+	 * we are still safe.
+	 */
+	if (hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer))
+		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&dl_se->inactive_timer);
+	else
+		add_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
 
 	if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) ||
 	    dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, pi_se, rq_clock(rq))) {
@@ -614,14 +674,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 
 	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 
-	/*
-	 * The task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
-	 * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_fromd_dl()).
-	 */
-	if (!dl_task(p)) {
-		__dl_clear_params(p);
+	if (!dl_task(p))
 		goto unlock;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * The task might have been boosted by someone else and might be in the
@@ -800,6 +854,44 @@ throttle:
 	}
 }
 
+static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
+{
+	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = container_of(timer,
+						     struct sched_dl_entity,
+						     inactive_timer);
+	struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct rq *rq;
+
+	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
+
+	if (!dl_task(p)) {
+		__dl_clear_params(p);
+
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+	if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	sched_clock_tick();
+	update_rq_clock(rq);
+
+	sub_running_bw(dl_se, &rq->dl);
+unlock:
+	task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
+	put_task_struct(p);
+
+	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+}
+
+void init_inactive_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+	struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->inactive_timer;
+
+	hrtimer_init(timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+	timer->function = inactive_task_timer;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
 static void inc_dl_deadline(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, u64 deadline)
@@ -976,7 +1068,8 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	 * run yet) will take care of this.
 	 */
 	if (p->dl.dl_throttled && !(flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)) {
-		add_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
+		if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) < 0)
+			add_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -997,7 +1090,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	update_curr_dl(rq);
 	__dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
 	if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP)
-		sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
+		task_go_inactive(p);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1071,6 +1164,23 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
+	if (rq != cpu_rq(cpu)) {
+		int migrate_active;
+
+		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		migrate_active = hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer);
+		if (migrate_active)
+			sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+		if (migrate_active) {
+			rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+			raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+			add_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+		}
+	}
+
+
 out:
 	return cpu;
 }
@@ -1232,8 +1342,6 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_struct *p)
 static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p));
-	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(&p->dl);
-	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
 
 	/*
 	 * Since we are TASK_DEAD we won't slip out of the domain!
@@ -1242,9 +1350,6 @@ static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p)
 	/* XXX we should retain the bw until 0-lag */
 	dl_b->total_bw -= p->dl.dl_bw;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dl_b->lock);
-
-	if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
-		sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
 }
 
 static void set_curr_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1720,15 +1825,23 @@ void __init init_sched_dl_class(void)
 static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	/*
-	 * Start the deadline timer; if we switch back to dl before this we'll
-	 * continue consuming our current CBS slice. If we stay outside of
-	 * SCHED_DEADLINE until the deadline passes, the timer will reset the
-	 * task.
+	 * task_go_inactive() can start the "inactive timer" (if the 0-lag
+	 * time is in the future). If the task switches back to dl before
+	 * the "inactive timer" fires, it can continue to consume its current
+	 * runtime using its current deadline. If it stays outside of
+	 * SCHED_DEADLINE until the 0-lag time passes, inactive_task_timer()
+	 * will reset the task parameters.
 	 */
-	if (!start_dl_timer(p))
-		__dl_clear_params(p);
+	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->dl.dl_runtime)
+		task_go_inactive(p);
 
-	if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
+	/*
+	 * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw()
+	 * at the 0-lag time, because the task could have been migrated
+	 * while SCHED_OTHER in the meanwhile.
+	 */
+	if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer) &&
+		!hrtimer_callback_running(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
 		sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
 
 	/*
@@ -1750,6 +1863,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
 		setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
+	add_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
 
 	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index bc05c29..22d36b2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1315,6 +1315,7 @@ extern void init_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, u64 period, u64 runtime
 extern struct dl_bandwidth def_dl_bandwidth;
 extern void init_dl_bandwidth(struct dl_bandwidth *dl_b, u64 period, u64 runtime);
 extern void init_dl_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
+extern void init_inactive_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
 
 unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime);
 
-- 
2.5.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists