[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FE984C.10807@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:48:28 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/18] dt-bindings: Add PLX Technology OXNAS pinctrl
and gpio bindings
On 04/01/2016 05:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What should I use ?
>
> Maybe gpio-ranges as you asked. Not really sure as I haven't used it.
If I use gpio-ranges I can get rid of gpio-bank and ngpios properties.
>
>> I need to repost in a separate patchset with vendor replaced by Oxford Semiconductor.
>> Should I get rid of the vendor prefix of gpio-bank ?
>
> No, because I think you should get rid of the property.
>
> Rob
>
If gpio-ranges is OK, I can post it ASAP.
Thanks,
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists