linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1459525755-36968-2-git-send-email-shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri,  1 Apr 2016 23:48:59 +0800
From:	Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, stefano.stabellini@...rix.com
Cc:	david.vrabel@...rix.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, julien.grall@....com,
	peter.huangpeng@...wei.com, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	zhaoshenglong@...wei.com, shannon.zhao@...aro.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
Subject: [PATCH v10 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.

CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> (supporter:ACPI)
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> (supporter:ACPI)
CC: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 5f28cf7..4d2d9eb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list);
 DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
 LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
+static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
 
 struct acpi_dep_data {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -1453,6 +1454,44 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+					    void *context)
+{
+	struct resource *res = context;
+
+	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
+		return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct resource res;
+
+	/* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
+	if (!(spcr_uart_addr && acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The UART device described in SPCR table is assumed to have only one
+	 * memory resource present. So we only look for the first one here.
+	 */
+	status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
+				     acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return false;
+
+	if (res.start == spcr_uart_addr) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n",
+		       &res.start);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
 				    unsigned long long *sta)
 {
@@ -1466,6 +1505,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
 	switch (acpi_type) {
 	case ACPI_TYPE_ANY:		/* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
 	case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+		if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
+			return -ENODEV;
+
 		*type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
 		status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
@@ -1916,9 +1958,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
 	return result < 0 ? result : 0;
 }
 
+static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
+
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
+				(struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+		spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
+	else
+		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
+}
+
 int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 {
 	int result;
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
 
 	acpi_pci_root_init();
 	acpi_pci_link_init();
@@ -1934,6 +1991,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 
 	acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
 
+	/*
+	 * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
+	 * device in SPCR table.
+	 */
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
+				(struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+		if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
+			printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
+
+		if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart)
+			acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
+	}
+
 	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
 	/*
 	 * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
-- 
2.1.4