| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1459538283-3031249-4-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:18:03 -0400
From: green@...uxhacker.ru
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] staging/lustre: Get rid of ldlm_policy_res_t typedef
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Directly use enum ldlm_policy_res everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h | 2 -
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 49 +++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
index 351f8b4..ba643e6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
@@ -218,8 +218,6 @@ enum ldlm_policy_res {
LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK
};
-typedef enum ldlm_policy_res ldlm_policy_res_t;
-
#define LDLM_POOL_SYSFS_PRINT_int(v) sprintf(buf, "%d\n", v)
#define LDLM_POOL_SYSFS_SET_int(a, b) { a = b; }
#define LDLM_POOL_SYSFS_PRINT_u64(v) sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", v)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index 9ff5ad0..9de9fa0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1131,12 +1131,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_cli_cancel_list_local);
* dirty data, to close a file, ...) or waiting for any RPCs in-flight (e.g.
* readahead requests, ...)
*/
-static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
- struct ldlm_lock *lock,
- int unused, int added,
- int count)
+static enum ldlm_policy_res
+ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock *lock,
+ int unused, int added, int count)
{
- ldlm_policy_res_t result = LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
+ enum ldlm_policy_res result = LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
/* don't check added & count since we want to process all locks
* from unused list.
@@ -1168,10 +1167,10 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
*
* \retval LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK cancel lock from LRU
*/
-static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
- struct ldlm_lock *lock,
- int unused, int added,
- int count)
+static enum ldlm_policy_res ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
+ struct ldlm_lock *lock,
+ int unused, int added,
+ int count)
{
unsigned long cur = cfs_time_current();
struct ldlm_pool *pl = &ns->ns_pool;
@@ -1214,10 +1213,10 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
*
* \retval LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK cancel lock from LRU
*/
-static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_passed_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
- struct ldlm_lock *lock,
- int unused, int added,
- int count)
+static enum ldlm_policy_res ldlm_cancel_passed_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
+ struct ldlm_lock *lock,
+ int unused, int added,
+ int count)
{
/* Stop LRU processing when we reach past @count or have checked all
* locks in LRU.
@@ -1235,10 +1234,10 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_passed_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
*
* \retval LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK cancel lock from LRU
*/
-static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_aged_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
- struct ldlm_lock *lock,
- int unused, int added,
- int count)
+static enum ldlm_policy_res ldlm_cancel_aged_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
+ struct ldlm_lock *lock,
+ int unused, int added,
+ int count)
{
if ((added >= count) &&
time_before(cfs_time_current(),
@@ -1251,13 +1250,13 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_aged_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
return LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
}
-static ldlm_policy_res_t
+static enum ldlm_policy_res
ldlm_cancel_lrur_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
struct ldlm_lock *lock,
int unused, int added,
int count)
{
- ldlm_policy_res_t result;
+ enum ldlm_policy_res result;
result = ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(ns, lock, unused, added, count);
if (result == LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK)
@@ -1275,10 +1274,9 @@ ldlm_cancel_lrur_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
*
* \retval LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK cancel lock from LRU
*/
-static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_default_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
- struct ldlm_lock *lock,
- int unused, int added,
- int count)
+static enum ldlm_policy_res
+ldlm_cancel_default_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock *lock,
+ int unused, int added, int count)
{
/* Stop LRU processing when we reach past count or have checked all
* locks in LRU.
@@ -1287,7 +1285,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_default_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK : LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
}
-typedef ldlm_policy_res_t (*ldlm_cancel_lru_policy_t)(struct ldlm_namespace *,
+typedef enum ldlm_policy_res (*ldlm_cancel_lru_policy_t)(
+ struct ldlm_namespace *,
struct ldlm_lock *, int,
int, int);
@@ -1368,7 +1367,7 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
LASSERT(pf);
while (!list_empty(&ns->ns_unused_list)) {
- ldlm_policy_res_t result;
+ enum ldlm_policy_res result;
time_t last_use = 0;
/* all unused locks */
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists