[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FECA9B.20902@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 12:23:07 -0700
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH v7 7/7] cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on
scheduler utilization data
On 04/01/2016 12:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 07:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> ...
>>> +config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>> + tristate "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
>>> + depends on CPU_FREQ
>>> + select CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET
>>> + select IRQ_WORK
>>> + help
>>> + This governor makes decisions based on the utilization data provided
>>> + by the scheduler. It sets the CPU frequency to be proportional to
>>> + the utilization/capacity ratio coming from the scheduler. If the
>>> + utilization is frequency-invariant, the new frequency is also
>>> + proportional to the maximum available frequency. If that is not the
>>> + case, it is proportional to the current frequency of the CPU with the
>>> + tipping point at utilization/capacity equal to 80%.
>>
>> This help text implies that the tipping point of 80% applies only to
>> non-frequency invariant configurations, rather than both. Possible to
>> rephrase?
>
> Sure.
>
> What about:
>
> "If that is not the case, it is proportional to the current frequency
> of the CPU. The frequency tipping point is at utilization/capacity
> equal to 80% in both cases."
LGTM
thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists