linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 6/7] drivers:hv: Record MMIO range in use by frame buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1459558067-1725-7-git-send-email-jakeo@microsoft.com>
Date:	Fri,  1 Apr 2016 17:47:46 -0700
From:	Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
To:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	kys@...rosoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
	vkuznets@...hat.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, haddenh@...rosoft.com
Cc:	Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/7] drivers:hv: Record MMIO range in use by frame buffer

Later in the boot sequence, we need to figure out which memory
ranges can be given out to various paravirtual drivers.  The
hyperv_fb driver should, ideally, be placed right on top of
the frame buffer, without some other device getting plopped on
top of this range in the meantime.  Recording this now allows
that to be guaranteed.

Signed-off-by: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
---
 drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index dfc6149..eaa5c3b 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/screen_info.h>
 #include <linux/kdebug.h>
+#include <linux/efi.h>
 #include "hyperv_vmbus.h"
 
 static struct acpi_device  *hv_acpi_dev;
@@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ static struct notifier_block hyperv_panic_block = {
 	.notifier_call = hyperv_panic_event,
 };
 
+static const char *fb_mmio_name = "fb_range";
+static struct resource *fb_mmio;
 struct resource *hyperv_mmio;
 DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(hyperv_mmio_lock);
 
@@ -1091,6 +1094,12 @@ static int vmbus_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	struct resource *next_res;
 
 	if (hyperv_mmio) {
+		if (fb_mmio) {
+			__release_region(hyperv_mmio, fb_mmio->start,
+					 resource_size(fb_mmio));
+			fb_mmio = NULL;
+		}
+
 		for (cur_res = hyperv_mmio; cur_res; cur_res = next_res) {
 			next_res = cur_res->sibling;
 			kfree(cur_res);
@@ -1100,6 +1109,30 @@ static int vmbus_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void vmbus_reserve_fb(void)
+{
+	int size;
+	/*
+	 * Make a claim for the frame buffer in the resource tree under the
+	 * first node, which will be the one below 4GB.  The length seems to
+	 * be underreported, particularly in a Generation 1 VM.  So start out
+	 * reserving a larger area and make it smaller until it succeeds.
+	 */
+
+	if (screen_info.lfb_base) {
+		if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
+			size = max_t(__u32, screen_info.lfb_size, 0x800000);
+		else
+			size = max_t(__u32, screen_info.lfb_size, 0x4000000);
+
+		for (; !fb_mmio && (size >= 0x100000); size >>= 1) {
+			fb_mmio = __request_region(hyperv_mmio,
+						   screen_info.lfb_base, size,
+						   fb_mmio_name, 0);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * vmbus_allocate_mmio() - Pick a memory-mapped I/O range.
  * @new:		If successful, supplied a pointer to the
@@ -1261,8 +1294,10 @@ static int vmbus_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(result))
 			continue;
-		if (hyperv_mmio)
+		if (hyperv_mmio) {
+			vmbus_reserve_fb();
 			break;
+		}
 	}
 	ret_val = 0;
 
-- 
1.9.1