linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 010/170] ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work during inetdev destroy.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1459558456-24452-11-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri,  1 Apr 2016 17:51:36 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 010/170] ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work during inetdev destroy.

3.19.8-ckt18 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>

commit fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2 upstream.

When an inetdev is destroyed, every address assigned to the interface
is removed.  And in this scenerio we do two pointless things which can
be very expensive if the number of assigned interfaces is large:

1) Address promotion.  We are deleting all addresses, so there is no
   point in doing this.

2) A full nf conntrack table purge for every address.  We only need to
   do this once, as is already caught by the existing
   masq_dev_notifier so masq_inet_event() can skip this.

Reported-by: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Tested-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/ipv4/devinet.c                          |  4 ++++
 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c                     |  4 ++++
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 4f8ea2d..22ae8f7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -334,6 +334,9 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev, struct in_ifaddr **ifap,
 
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
+	if (in_dev->dead)
+		goto no_promotions;
+
 	/* 1. Deleting primary ifaddr forces deletion all secondaries
 	 * unless alias promotion is set
 	 **/
@@ -380,6 +383,7 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev, struct in_ifaddr **ifap,
 			fib_del_ifaddr(ifa, ifa1);
 	}
 
+no_promotions:
 	/* 2. Unlink it */
 
 	*ifap = ifa1->ifa_next;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 23104a3..d4c698c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -814,6 +814,9 @@ void fib_del_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct in_ifaddr *iprim)
 		subnet = 1;
 	}
 
+	if (in_dev->dead)
+		goto no_promotions;
+
 	/* Deletion is more complicated than add.
 	 * We should take care of not to delete too much :-)
 	 *
@@ -889,6 +892,7 @@ void fib_del_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct in_ifaddr *iprim)
 		}
 	}
 
+no_promotions:
 	if (!(ok & BRD_OK))
 		fib_magic(RTM_DELROUTE, RTN_BROADCAST, ifa->ifa_broadcast, 32, prim);
 	if (subnet && ifa->ifa_prefixlen < 31) {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4.c
index c6eb421..ea91058 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4.c
@@ -108,10 +108,18 @@ static int masq_inet_event(struct notifier_block *this,
 			   unsigned long event,
 			   void *ptr)
 {
-	struct net_device *dev = ((struct in_ifaddr *)ptr)->ifa_dev->dev;
+	struct in_device *idev = ((struct in_ifaddr *)ptr)->ifa_dev;
 	struct netdev_notifier_info info;
 
-	netdev_notifier_info_init(&info, dev);
+	/* The masq_dev_notifier will catch the case of the device going
+	 * down.  So if the inetdev is dead and being destroyed we have
+	 * no work to do.  Otherwise this is an individual address removal
+	 * and we have to perform the flush.
+	 */
+	if (idev->dead)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	netdev_notifier_info_init(&info, idev->dev);
 	return masq_device_event(this, event, &info);
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4