lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160402093239.GA305@x4>
Date:	Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:32:39 +0200
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: "perf: interrupt took too long" messages even with
 perf_cpu_time_max_percent==0

Current git kernel sometimes shows:

 perf: interrupt took too long (71 > 52), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 300
 perf: interrupt took too long (103 > 88), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 300
 perf: interrupt took too long (130 > 128), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 300
 perf: interrupt took too long (175 > 162), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 300
 perf: interrupt took too long (219 > 218), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 300
...

when running e.g. "perf top" even when  
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent is set to 0.

-- 
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ