[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGhQ9VyW4YNUGrgw1d5HBXutyBqjxP=+0ZGuYrtmnguC=MwMMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 15:41:24 +0200
From: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armv7-m: add address to unit name
On 2 April 2016 at 08:08, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
> Add address to unit name to remove the following warning:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /nv-interrupt-controller has a
> reg or ranges property, but no unit name
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Not sure through which tree this should go but an earlier patch
> seemd to be applied directly by you...
>
> --
> Stefan
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armv7-m.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armv7-m.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armv7-m.dtsi
> index b1ad7cf..8126bec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armv7-m.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armv7-m.dtsi
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> #include "skeleton.dtsi"
>
> / {
> - nvic: nv-interrupt-controller {
> + nvic: nv-interrupt-controller@...000e100 {
While changing the line it might be good idea to use the standard
'interrupt-controller' name instead.
I posted the same patch couple of days ago, btw.
http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=145929088915714&w=2
But I don't care which one that is applied.
regards,
Joachim Eastwood
Powered by blists - more mailing lists