linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 02 Apr 2016 09:36:20 -0700
From:	James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to
 scsi_target_state

On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 14:53 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state to avoid
> running
> into the BUG_ON() in scsi_target_reap().
> 
> This intermediate state is only valid in the path from
> scsi_remove_target() to
> scsi_target_destroy() indicating this target is going to be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> Fixes: 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38

The code and ordering is fine with me, so you can add

Reviewed-by: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

However, I'd really appreciate it if the description of what was going
on was clearer for a non-SUSE distro maintainer.  What we're doing is
applying a more comprehensive fix for a previously hack fixed problem
and then reverting the hack.  I think message 1 should say "this
refixes the problem introduced by commit X in a more comprehensive way"

and message 2 "Now that we've done a more comprehensive fix with the
intermediate target state in patch Y, we can remove the previous hack"

James