[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57000D4B.5000406@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:19:55 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Torvald Riegel <triegel@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 4/7] futex: Add support for attached futexes
On 04/02/2016 04:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[omitted due to some Thunderbird bug, sigh]
What happens if you mix attached an non-attached ops on the same futex?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists