[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160402002840.GA5329@linux-uzut.site>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:28:40 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
>From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
>This is no longer used anywhere and all callers (__down_write) use
>0 as a subclass. Ditch __down_write_nested to make the code easier
>to follow.
>
>This shouldn't introduce any functional change.
>
>Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists