[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1604031205320.3978@nanos>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 12:08:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Torvald Riegel <triegel@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 7/7] [PATCH] glibc: nptl: Add support for attached
pthread_mutexes
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:09:20AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > To undo the attachment each involved thread needs to call
> >
> > pthread_mutex_detach_np(&mutex);
> >
> > When the last user detaches the kernel state is destroyed.
>
> So I was fully expecting pthread_mutex_{at,de}tach_np() to not exist and
> be internal to pthread_mutex_{init,destroy}().
>
> Is there a reason this is not so?
init/destroy are only called once and not on all threads using the futex. If
you want to hide that, then you need to add it to all pthread_mutex_*
operations and attach on the first call.
That's possible, but for simplicity we made it explicit.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists