[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160403182543.GQ19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:25:43 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] ARM: start to move arch/arm/mach-* to
arch/arm/platforms/*
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We have growing number of mach-* directories in arch/arm, and I guess
> it might be a good time to discuss moving them into a sub-directory.
What does it buy us? Let me summarise the actual change:
- Move up to 71 arch/arm/mach-* directories to arch/arm/platforms/*,
which just means another level of directory structure. We still
end up with up to 71 directories in arch/arm/platforms/
- The ability to use obj-y rather than machine-y, where both already
work in the same way.
Is there anything I missed?
If that is all, then I really do not like this change - it's seems
to be churn for no benefit, and that's something we really should be
minimising. Linus Torvalds has historically moaned at the ARM
architecture for stuff like this.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists