[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160403234903.GA5833@bbox>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:49:03 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over
limit
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection")
> >
> > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most
> > probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Also this patch will most
> > likely see some changes in future so making changes on top which should
> > go in independetly will likely just complicate things.
>
> Yes, we'll need two patches please. One to fix 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm:
> vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()") (which is in
> mainline) and a second to clean up -mm's "mm, oom: rework oom detection".
Andrew, Michal
Thanks. I just sent out it as separate patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists