lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:49:03 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over
 limit

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection")
> > 
> > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most
> > probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Also this patch will most
> > likely see some changes in future so making changes on top which should
> > go in independetly will likely just complicate things.
> 
> Yes, we'll need two patches please.  One to fix 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm:
> vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()") (which is in
> mainline) and a second to clean up -mm's "mm, oom: rework oom detection".

Andrew, Michal

Thanks. I just sent out it as separate patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ