[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160405104844.3cc45db8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:48:44 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] lib/uuid: introduce few more generic helpers for
UUID
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:40:29 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:30:05 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > There are new helpers in this patch:
> >
> > uuid_is_valid checks if a UUID is valid
> > uuid_be_to_bin converts from string to binary (big endian)
> > uuid_le_to_bin converts from string to binary (little endian)
> >
> > They will be used in future, i.e. in the following patches in the series.
> >
> > This also moves indices arrays to lib/uuid.c to be shared accross modules.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/uuid.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/uuid.h
>
> Nit:
>
> > +/**
> > + * uuid_is_valid - checks if UUID string valid
> > + * @uuid: UUID string to check
> > + *
> > + * Description:
> > + * It checks if the UUID string is following the format:
> > + * xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > + * where x is a hex digit.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, %-EINVAL otherwise.
> > + */
> > +int uuid_is_valid(const char *uuid)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + if (strnlen(uuid, UUID_STRING_LEN) < UUID_STRING_LEN)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < UUID_STRING_LEN; i++) {
> > + if (i == 8 || i == 13 || i == 18 || i == 23) {
> > + if (uuid[i] != '-')
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + } else if (!isxdigit(uuid[i])) {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Could add
>
> if (uuid[i])
> return -EINVAL;
>
> here and lose the additional pass across the input (strlen).
also, why is this not a bool function?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists