linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support calling functions on a dedicated pcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:03:55 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC:	<jeremy@...p.org>, <jdelvare@...e.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<hpa@...or.com>, <akataria@...are.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	<mingo@...hat.com>, <Douglas_Warzecha@...l.com>,
	<pali.rohar@...il.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support
 calling functions on a dedicated pcpu

On 05/04/16 11:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
> 
> No, I don't think this is a good idea. In the EINVAL or EBUSY case a
> simple Xen admin command might be enough to make the next call succeed.
> I don't want to disable pinning in this case.

Ok.

Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>

David