[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160405122327.GU3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:23:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/7] Track the active utilisation
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:12:27PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> @@ -1210,6 +1232,8 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_struct *p)
> static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p));
> + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(&p->dl);
> + struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
>
> /*
> * Since we are TASK_DEAD we won't slip out of the domain!
> @@ -1218,6 +1242,9 @@ static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p)
> /* XXX we should retain the bw until 0-lag */
> dl_b->total_bw -= p->dl.dl_bw;
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dl_b->lock);
> +
> + if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
> }
>
A dead task cannot be running, not be queued, right? ISTR you remove
this hunk in a later patch as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists