[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNScDZCt2weJBNU4JW9RYQjGftFwaQSBh=68wueCEDtvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:19:32 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"open list:SUSPEND TO RAM" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/27] kernel/power/swap.c: use bio_get_base_vec()
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> I really don't like all these bio_get_base_vec uses. The end_io
> handlers generall want to iterate over all pages in the bio, with
> a special case where all of them is the fixed number one.
>
> So What I think we'll need is a bio_for_each_page, and if there is
> any good justification for it as special version of the single
> page case.
I thought about that too, and bio_get_base_vec() can be thought as
the special version too, IMO. Actually it is just about the name of
the helper, do you have a better name or other idea for such issue?
There are about ten such usages, as found in this patchset.
Thanks,
Ming Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists