[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5703B8E8.3080408@xora.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:08:56 +0100
From: Graeme Gregory <graeme@...a.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms
On 22/03/16 21:45, David Daney wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 11:48 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 06:59 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>
>>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>>
>>> v15:
>>>
>>> - Make the distance-map node optional (again), if it is not in
>>> the device tree, default values are used.
>>>
>>> - Minor cleanups to of_numa.c as suggested by Rob Harring.
>>
>> Hi David, all,
>>
>> Wondering what the status of this patch series is currently?
>
> I haven't seen any feedback on v15. My assumption was that the relevant
> arm64 maintainers would take some sort of action after the merge window
> quiets down.
>
> In any event, I am happy to make any improvements that may be suggested.
>
Post merge window series does not apply to 4.6-rc2 or next.
Patch 4 collides in arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
Thanks
Graeme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists