[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160405134748.GA31683@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:47:48 -0400
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] parport: register driver later
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:44:12AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > A bit better commit message here would have caused me to notice it.
> > Something like "Revert a broken patch because it crashes all of our
> > machines without it!!!" would be a hint it needed to go in :)
>
> Didn't my revert of e7223f1860 fix this?
Yes.
> > I think the lack of parport hardware around seems to have caused a total
> > lack of testing this code path while it was in linux-next and in my
> > local testing, sorry about that, it should have been caught a lot
> > earlier.
>
> Well, the original 0day kernel test robot report was from the
> linux-next days, back in February. I reverted the commit that the
> kernel test robot indicated was the point where the actual trouble
> started two weeks ago (commit 1701f680407c).
>
> I was hoping that would be it. Have there been reports since that I
> haven't seen?
Not that I have seen. But I missed the 0day report so I might not be
the best judge here...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists