linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] drivers/mfd: make max14577.c explicitly non-modular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:24:32 -0400
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] drivers/mfd: make max14577.c explicitly non-modular

Hello Krzysztof,

On 04/03/2016 11:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04.04.2016 06:24, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>>
>> mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_MAX14577
>> mfd/Kconfig:   bool "Maxim Semiconductor MAX14577/77836 MUIC + Charger Support"
>>
>> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>>
>> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
>> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
>>
>> Since module_init was not in use by this code, the init ordering
>> remains unchanged with this commit.
>>
>> Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.
>>
>> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
>> is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
>>
>> Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/max14577.c | 13 +------------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> +Cc Javier,
> 
> In general I agree with the patchset except maybe here because it
> conflicts with Javier's work to make it a module:
> mfd: max14577: Use module_init() instead of subsys_initcall()
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2213747.html
> 
> Javier's patchset is however missing a tested-by tag so maybe this is
> why it was not merged.
> 
> Unfortunately I cannot provide testing because my current device with
> max14577/max77836 is dead and its recovery is not easy. Maybe I will get
> a proper device in a few weeks after going back to Poland.
> 
> My proposal would be to wait with this max14577 change a little bit.
> 

Chanwoo said he should be able to test: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/18/78
So hopefully I should have some Tested-by tags for that series soon.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America