linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160405153203.GJ5264@leon.nu>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:32:03 +0300
From:	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...n.nu>
To:	oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>
Cc:	dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
	hal.rosenstock@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
	ogerlitz@...lanox.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gongyangming@...wei.com, xiaokun@...wei.com,
	tangchaofei@...wei.com, haifeng.wei@...wei.com,
	yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, yankejian@...wei.com,
	lisheng011@...wei.com, charles.chenxin@...wei.com,
	linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:32:53PM +0800, oulijun wrote:
> >>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.c   | 2832 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.h   |  985 +++++++
> >                                           ^^^^^^
> > Do you support v1 of RoCE or v1 of your HW?
> > 
> Here, v1 stands for hw, that is, we support v1 of our hw.

So you should write hns_roce_hw_v1 and not hns_roce_v1_hw

> >>  23 files changed, 10429 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Please appreciate the effort needed to review such large patch and
> > invest time and effort to divide this to number of small easy review patches.
> > 
>     Surely, i have pay attention to the patch, but i consider that it is not better to
> split the patch into small patch. because it will the base function of RoCE.
>     For your advice, i will make further efforts to taking a discussion how to reslove the question.

Faisal Latif's submission [1] can help you to get inspiration.

Also please DON'T submit your patches till you get rid of unrelated
functions/macros/defines and DMA operations for register access.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/668721/

> 
> thanks
> Lijun Ou
> > .
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html