[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160404183003.GA8697@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:30:03 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched/fair: let cpu's cfs_rq to reflect task
migration
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:11:54PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:28:49PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > > I think I follow - Leo please correct me if I mangle your intentions.
> > > It's an issue that Morten and Dietmar had mentioned to me as well.
>
> Yes. We have been working on this issue for a while without getting to a
> nice solution yet.
So do you want a "flat hirarchy" for util_avg - just do util_avg for
rq and task respectively? Seems it is what you want, and it is even easier?
Thanks,
Yuyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists