[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160405154423.GK5264@leon.nu>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:44:23 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...n.nu>
To: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:55:26AM -0700, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:39:21AM -0700, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> I am not really trying to address OFED issues here. I am sure you
> >> understand that if ib_core.ko kernel module is in-kernel module than,
> >> for all the fixes/enhancements that goes to it would require people to
> >> upgrade to newer kernel, instead of just modules upgrade. Such heavy
> >> weight upgrade slows down the adoption which i am trying to avoid here
> >> by placing knobs in right kernel module's hand.
> >
> > What a load of rubbish. The Linux kernel is one program and should be
> > upgraded together.
>
> Just because we add one more rdma resource, we need to ask someone to
> upgrade kernel?
It doesn't make sense. Kernel and modules are always coming together,
the attempts to mix kernel and modules from different versions can lead
to many interesting debug scenarios.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists