linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160405165147.GC15993@naverao1-tp.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:21:47 +0530
From:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
> >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
> >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
> >quickly tag the precise problem.
> >
> >Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
> >Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> >Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> >Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
> >Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> >Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of
> available ppc instructions. Nice.
> 
> I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?

Yes, all these tests pass on x86_64.

- Naveen