linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160405180252.GP3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:02:52 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:56:57PM +0200, luca abeni wrote:

> > > +		migrate_active = hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer);
> > > +		if (migrate_active)
> > > +			sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
> > > +		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> > 
> > At this point task_rq() is still the above rq, so if the inactive timer
> > hits here it will lock this rq and subtract the running bw here _again_,
> > right?
> I think it will see the task state as TASK_RUNNING, so it will do nothing.
> Or it will cancelled later when the task is enqueued... I'll double check this.

Right, so this is select_task_rq_dl(), we run this in wakeups, before
TASK_RUNNING.