linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:27:55 +0000
From:	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	"andy.gross@...aro.org" <andy.gross@...aro.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"svarbanov@...sol.com" <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
	"architt@...eaurora.org" <architt@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"okaya@...eaurora.org" <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gpramod@...eaurora.org" <gpramod@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 16:21 -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are
> > > > managed remotely
> > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes.
> > > > So skip the bam_init
> > > > for any such platform if DT property is set.
> > > > 
> > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C
> > > > boards.
> > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA
> > > > controller.
> > > 
> > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first.
> > 
> > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an
> > update in
> > my queue
> 
> No updates that I can see.  The original is here:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113
> 

And that seemed to have some discussion so I dont recall looking at it. 

-- 
~Vinod