linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/31] huge tmpfs: disband split huge pmds on race or memory failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1604051425400.5965@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Ning Qu <quning@...il.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/31] huge tmpfs: disband split huge pmds on race or memory
 failure

Andres L-C has pointed out that the single-page unmap_mapping_range()
fallback in truncate_inode_page() cannot protect against the case when
a huge page was faulted in after the full-range unmap_mapping_range():
because page_mapped(page) checks tail page's mapcount, not the head's.

So, there's a danger that hole-punching (and maybe even truncation)
can free pages while they are mapped into userspace with a huge pmd.
And I don't believe that the CVE-2014-4171 protection in shmem_fault()
can fully protect from this, although it does make it much harder.

Fix that by adding a duplicate single-page unmap_mapping_range()
into shmem_disband_hugeteam() (called when punching or truncating
a PageTeam), at the point when we also hold the head's page lock
(without which there would still be races): which will then split
all huge pmd mappings covering the page into team pte mappings.

This is also just what's needed to handle memory_failure() correctly:
provide custom shmem_error_remove_page(), call shmem_disband_hugeteam()
from that before proceeding to generic_error_remove_page(), then this
additional unmap_mapping_range() will remap team by ptes as needed.

(There is an unlikely case that we're racing with another disbander,
or disband didn't get trylock on head page at first: memory_failure()
has almost finished with the page, so it's safe to unlock and relock
before retrying.)

But there is one further change needed in hwpoison_user_mappings():
it must recognize a hugely mapped team before concluding that the
page is not mapped.  (And still no support for soft_offline(),
which will have to wait for page migration of teams.)

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c |    7 ++++++-
 mm/shmem.c          |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include <linux/rmap.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/pageteam.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
 #include <linux/migrate.h>
@@ -902,6 +903,7 @@ static int hwpoison_user_mappings(struct
 	enum ttu_flags ttu = TTU_UNMAP | TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS;
 	struct address_space *mapping;
 	LIST_HEAD(tokill);
+	bool mapped;
 	int ret;
 	int kill = 1, forcekill;
 	struct page *hpage = *hpagep;
@@ -919,7 +921,10 @@ static int hwpoison_user_mappings(struct
 	 * This check implies we don't kill processes if their pages
 	 * are in the swap cache early. Those are always late kills.
 	 */
-	if (!page_mapped(hpage))
+	mapped = page_mapped(hpage);
+	if (PageTeam(p) && team_pmd_mapped(team_head(p)))
+		mapped = true;
+	if (!mapped)
 		return SWAP_SUCCESS;
 
 	if (PageKsm(p)) {
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -605,6 +605,19 @@ static void shmem_disband_hugeteam(struc
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * truncate_inode_page() will unmap page if page_mapped(page),
+	 * but there's a race by which the team could be hugely mapped,
+	 * with page_mapped(page) saying false.  So check here if the
+	 * head is hugely mapped, and if so unmap page to remap team.
+	 * Use a loop because there is no good locking against a
+	 * concurrent remap_team_by_ptes().
+	 */
+	while (team_pmd_mapped(head)) {
+		unmap_mapping_range(page->mapping,
+			(loff_t)page->index << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * Disable preemption because truncation may end up spinning until a
 	 * tail PageTeam has been cleared: we hold the lock as briefly as we
 	 * can (splitting disband in two stages), but better not be preempted.
@@ -1305,6 +1318,21 @@ static int shmem_getattr(struct vfsmount
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int shmem_error_remove_page(struct address_space *mapping,
+				   struct page *page)
+{
+	if (PageTeam(page)) {
+		shmem_disband_hugeteam(page);
+		while (unlikely(PageTeam(page))) {
+			unlock_page(page);
+			cond_resched();
+			lock_page(page);
+			shmem_disband_hugeteam(page);
+		}
+	}
+	return generic_error_remove_page(mapping, page);
+}
+
 static int shmem_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
@@ -4088,7 +4116,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operat
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 	.migratepage	= migrate_page,
 #endif
-	.error_remove_page = generic_error_remove_page,
+	.error_remove_page = shmem_error_remove_page,
 };
 
 static const struct file_operations shmem_file_operations = {