linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] bam dma fixes and one dt extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:33:17 -0500
From:	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
To:	Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bam dma fixes and one dt extension

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Here are three bam dma fixes, which I made during testing qcrypto
> driver. The first one is a real fix, the second one is related to
> peripherals on which the BAM IP is initialized by remote execution
> environment, and the third one is a sleeping bug IMO.
> 
> The last patch is a extension again for peripherals which BAM is
> remotely controlled by other execution environment.
> 
> All patches has been tested on db410c board with apq8016.
> 

Stan,

Can you resend these patches w/ updates?  Or at least the remote control patch
if you can get that out faster.  And also include the dmaengine list.

Regards,

Andy