linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160406003006.GA3084175@devbig084.prn1.facebook.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:30:07 -0700
From:	Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To:	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
CC:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>,
	Sebastian Roesner <sroesner-kernelorg@...sner-online.de>,
	"4.2+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256
 bvecs

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:27:33PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:27:21AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:44:06AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
> > > be very big. We have to split the bio into small bios so that
> > > each holds at most BIO_MAX_PAGES bvecs for safety reason, such
> > > as bio_clone().
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes the following kernel crash:
> > > 
> > > > [  172.660142] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > > > 0000000000000028
> > > > [  172.660229] IP: [<ffffffff811e53b4>] bio_trim+0xf/0x2a
> > > > [  172.660289] PGD 7faf3e067 PUD 7f9279067 PMD 0
> > > > [  172.660399] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > > [...]
> > > > [  172.664780] Call Trace:
> > > > [  172.664813]  [<ffffffffa007f3be>] ? raid1_make_request+0x2e8/0xad7 [raid1]
> > > > [  172.664846]  [<ffffffff811f07da>] ? blk_queue_split+0x377/0x3d4
> > > > [  172.664880]  [<ffffffffa005fb5f>] ? md_make_request+0xf6/0x1e9 [md_mod]
> > > > [  172.664912]  [<ffffffff811eb860>] ? generic_make_request+0xb5/0x155
> > > > [  172.664947]  [<ffffffffa0445c89>] ? prio_io+0x85/0x95 [bcache]
> > > > [  172.664981]  [<ffffffffa0448252>] ? register_cache_set+0x355/0x8d0 [bcache]
> > > > [  172.665016]  [<ffffffffa04497d3>] ? register_bcache+0x1006/0x1174 [bcache]
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 54efd50(block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios)
> > 
> > this bug is introduced by d2be537c3ba
> > > Reported-by: Sebastian Roesner <sroesner-kernelorg@...sner-online.de>
> > > Reported-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org (4.2+)
> > > Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
> > > ---
> > > I can reproduce the issue and verify the fix by the following approach:
> > > 	- create one raid1 over two virtio-blk 
> > > 	- build bcache device over the above raid1 and another cache device.
> > > 	- set cache mode as writeback
> > > 	- run random write over ext4 on the bcache device
> > > 	- then the crash can be triggered
> > 
> > can you explain why this is better than my original patch?
> 
> Shaohua, what was your original patch? I'm sorry, I know I saw it at one point
> but I can't remember what it was.

this one:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145926976808760&w=2