lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160406004147.GA3100363@devbig084.prn1.facebook.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:41:47 -0700
From:	Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To:	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
CC:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>,
	Sebastian Roesner <sroesner-kernelorg@...sner-online.de>,
	"4.2+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256
 bvecs

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:36:04PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:30:07PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > this one:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145926976808760&w=2
> 
> Ah. that patch won't actually fix the bug, since md isn't using
> blk_default_limits, it's using blk_set_stacking_limits().

Not really, the limit is set by under layer disk not md, otherwise it
should be BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, but the reported bio has 2560 sectors.
blk_set_stacking_limits() will use it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ