[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5704CE0B.2010700@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:51:23 +0100
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
"Joao Pinto" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexander Usyskin" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] scsi: ufs: connect to RPMB subsystem
Hi!
On 4/4/2016 12:11 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
> implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
> accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security protocol
> out commands with UFS specific parameters. This multi step process is
> abstracted into 4 basic RPMB commands.
[snip]
> * "UFS device" W-LU.
> */
> struct scsi_device *sdev_ufs_device;
> + struct scsi_device *sdev_ufs_rpmb;
>
> enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode curr_dev_pwr_mode;
> enum uic_link_state uic_link_state;
>
I have a UFS device emulator that has the RPMB capability. What are the expected
good results for me to validate?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists