[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5704D978.1050101@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:40:08 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Charles Arndol <carnold@...e.com>,
Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@...e.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Gary Lin <GLin@...e.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
Jeffrey Cheung <JCheung@...e.com>,
Michael Chang <MChang@...e.com>,
Vojtěch Pavlík <vojtech@...e.cz>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: HVMLite / PVHv2 - using x86 EFI boot entry
On 06/04/16 03:40, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> * You don't need full EFI emulation
I think needing any EFI emulation inside Xen (which is where it would
need to be for dom0) is not suitable because of the increase in
hypervisor ABI.
I also still do not understand your objection to the current tiny stub.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists