[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160406101300.GA13719@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:13:00 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: zengzhaoxiu@....com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
dvlasenk@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/30] Add x86-specific parity functions
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:14:45PM +0800, zengzhaoxiu@....com wrote:
> From: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
>
> Use alternatives, lifted from arch_hweight
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h | 5 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/arch_parity.h | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 +-
> arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 8 +++
> arch/x86/lib/parity.c | 32 ++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch_parity.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/parity.c
...
> +static __always_inline unsigned int __arch_parity32(unsigned int w)
> +{
> + unsigned int res;
> +
> + asm(ALTERNATIVE("call __sw_parity32", POPCNT32 "; and $1, %0", X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
> + : "="REG_OUT (res)
> + : REG_IN (w)
> + : "cc");
So why all that churn instead of simply doing:
static __always_inline unsigned int __arch_parity32(unsigned int w)
{
return hweight32(w) & 1;
}
Ditto for the 64-bit version.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists