[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459942441.17884.77.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:34:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] sysctl: drop away useless label
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 15:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:56:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@
> linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > We have no locking in bin_uuid(). Thus, we may remove the out label
> > and use
> > return statements directly.
> >
> Sure, but we may add locking or resource allocation in the future, in
> which case this change will need to be undone. I think it's better to
> leave the code as-is. It's presently quite typical kernel code.
I have noticed you updated the patch already. I'm fine with either.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists