linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: replace kick_all_cpus_sync with synchronize_sched in kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:56:46 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: replace kick_all_cpus_sync with
 synchronize_sched in kmem_cache_shrink

On Fri 01-04-16 15:30:17, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> When we call __kmem_cache_shrink on memory cgroup removal, we need to
> synchronize kmem_cache->cpu_partial update with put_cpu_partial that
> might be running on other cpus. Currently, we achieve that by using
> kick_all_cpus_sync, which works as a system wide memory barrier. Though
> fast it is, this method has a flow - it issues a lot of IPIs, which
> might hurt high performance or real-time workloads.
> 
> To fix this, let's replace kick_all_cpus_sync with synchronize_sched.
> Although the latter one may take much longer to finish, it shouldn't be
> a problem in this particular case, because memory cgroups are destroyed
> asynchronously from a workqueue so that no user visible effects should
> be introduced. OTOH, it will save us from excessive IPIs when someone
> removes a cgroup.
> 
> Anyway, even if using synchronize_sched turns out to take too long, we
> can always introduce a kind of __kmem_cache_shrink batching so that this
> method would only be called once per one cgroup destruction (not per
> each per memcg kmem cache as it is now).
> 
> Reported-and-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 279e773d80d3..03067f43dcf4 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -3697,7 +3697,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s, bool deactivate)
>  		 * s->cpu_partial is checked locklessly (see put_cpu_partial),
>  		 * so we have to make sure the change is visible.
>  		 */
> -		kick_all_cpus_sync();
> +		synchronize_sched();
>  	}
>  
>  	flush_all(s);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs