[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002d01d1901b$9eab7ad0$dc027070$@net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:47:25 -0700
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Joe Perches'" <joe@...ches.com>,
"'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Len Brown'" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"'Viresh Kumar'" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] intel_pstate: Use pr_fmt
On 2106.03.06 08:13 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 07:51 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2016.04.05 02:44 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 13:28 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> The more common kernel mechanism to prefix messages
> is using a pr_fmt define like:
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> so this prefixes all messages and means that any
> new message added later will also be prefixed without
> copy/paste defects or omission.
Ok. Thanks for your reply and education (and Viresh also).
And sorry for my the ignorance in my patch submission last May.
... Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists