[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160406172805.GJ8961@cbox>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:28:05 +0200
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@....com,
fu.wei@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
wei@...hat.com, al.stone@...aro.org, gg@...mlogic.co.uk,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:37:31PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series allows KVM to work with ACPI on ARM64.
>
> Currently, the firmware tables are parsed by the the virtual timer and virtual
> GIC code in order to configure them correctly.
>
> However the parsing of these tables is already done in the GIC and arch timer
> drivers. This patch series introduces new helpers to retrieve the information
> from the different drivers in order to avoid duplication of the parsing code.
>
> To make the merge easier via the different trees, each patch modifies a single
> subsystem. The suggested plan to merge the series is divided in 3 steps:
>
> 1) Patches #1-#2 are merged via the clocksource tree
> Patches #2-#6 are merged via the irqchip tree
> 2) Patches #7-#8 are merge via the KVM tree
> 3) Patch #9 is merged via the clocksource tree.
>
I'm not a clocksource or irqchip expert, and far from an ACPI expert,
but this series overall looks good to me now.
I guess we'll need to wait until the patches are in the clocksource and
irqchip trees, and then merge that into the kvmarm tree, and apply patch
7 and 8 on top, or is there a simpler way to do this?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists